| Volume
13,
Number 4
|
Fall
2003
|
Winchester,
Virginia
|
|
|
DMAC’s
New Products Provide Expected Feed-Back for Unibase
|
|
DMAC’s new products Ace Contact
Manager, NetBased Software and Project Budget Manager have
provided the expected new ideas for making Unibase more
user-friendly. Some ideas have already been incorporated into
Unibase.
For instance, the download of Unibase
by DMAC no longer has a thirty-day time limit. The new limit is
ten records with no time limit. DMAC learned from its new products
that many users take more than 30 days to understand new software.
The NetStafTrakr and NetDirectri
products have pointed a way to make web access available to
Unibase by DMAC. Unfortunately web access is more complicated than
most users can handle without a Wide Area Network administrator.
DMAC is moving slowly in this area.
DMAC is developing full web site
automation; enabling buyers to complete purchases and receive
emailed program activation codes 24/7 for both new purchases and
upgrades. On-line help automation is also being developed for all
product lines.
Staying up to date with compilers and
operating systems seamlessly is also a must. DMAC’s people have
seen the negative results of failing to do this. Support for
database files (dbf) will come to Unibase by DMAC. Easy import and
export of user data must be high on any list.
Adding new upgrades easily with
complete assurance that the existing, related user data will not
be changed has been tested and well received for Ace Contact
Manager.
Ace now has a default data restorer
capability that will never overwrite a folder (file), but if the
folder is missing, the default data restorer will put out a new
default folder.
At DMAC we are working hard to make our
products easier to use. Stay tuned for a whole new set of
user-friendly enhancements.
|
|
User Chooses Unibase
by DMAC For Scrolling Fields, Picklist, And Snippets
|
|
Unibase by DMAC was paid a great
compliment by a new customer this fall. The new customer had spent
five months trying to get a DMAC competitor’s image entry
solution to meet the needs of a new, and very important, contract
they had been awarded. Under tremendous pressure because time was
running out, the new customer turned to Unibase by DMAC. Two weeks
later they were keying the job and couldn’t be more satisfied.
Some of the new customer’s comments
and observations:
First, the new customer liked the
smooth integration of Unibase Imaging with Unibase by DMAC.
Describing Unibase Imaging as, “just Unibase on steroids,” the
new customer recalled how he had to purchase a separate,
additional product in attempting to use the competitor’s
solution and it still wouldn’t work properly.
Next, the new customer wanted to use
two monitors because his images were wide and short. Although
Unibase by DMAC can do this, Tina showed him how he could cut the
image into snippets and then paste the snippets on the screen. The
user could use the red line feature to move the keyer’s eye
through all the snippets at once. Back at the user’s shop he
showed both approaches to his people. They chose the snippet
approach over two monitors. “Less head movement,” they said.
Then, the new customer addressed a
large list of possible choices which could change on the fly. The
user set up a pick list and away he went.
Somewhere in the training class, Tina
showed the new customer the scrolling fields of Unibase. This
feature allows multiple similar records to be displayed on the
same screen with complete scrolling back and forth in the records.
The user made this work one night when it rained after class.
“Great,” he said.
We’re happy at DMAC when a new user
is happy with Unibase by DMAC. What a nice Thanksgiving present
this user brought to DMAC! We
all hope his new project goes well.
|
|
Old Fogies Have Their
Value;They Understand Old Software
|
|
Snowstorms cause problems. Bad storms,
early in the fall, cause old computers to die. Or at least for one
new Unibase by DMAC client this is true.
Recently, DMAC received a call on a
Tuesday that an old computer running a 1990 version of Unibase had
died during a snowstorm. Not only was this an old version, it was
a Unix version. The caller said that if DMAC could help them out
of this unexpected bind they would be grateful.
Jon came to this old fogy (that is me,
Fred) and explained the problem. Told me that since I was as old
as the hills and probably could remember when this system was
installed, I could probably get it running faster than any one
else. The gauntlet was thrown; I rushed off chasing the windmill.
Mixed a few metaphors too.
What a happy ending to this story. The
new DMAC client had the old computer running when Fred arrived.
Fred just tweaked it a bit. The users technical support was
fantastic. In three days a LINUX version of Unibase was running
with at least one program moved over from the old UNIX correctly.
Also, all the old UNIX version programs were moved to the LINUX
box in ASCII format for the user to check out and start up at his
convenience. Once the user was “out of the woods,” Fred was
declared to be a “third foot” and sent on his way. Happy is
this old fogy who can be of assistance to DMAC clients.
|
|
DMAC
Looking for Ways To Improve “Questions And Answers” on Web
|
|
“Questions
and Answers” (Q&A) sounds boring; but it is not. Another way
of titling this subject is “knowledge transference
infrastructure.”
And
in 2004 DMAC will be significantly upgrading its Q&A. Our
users should be able to find answers to questions DMAC has
answered in the past for other users.
Sounds simple, but it is not.
Right
now various commercial products are being evaluated. About three
years ago DMAC installed Bugzilla. This is a nice product for
tracking bugs but does not make the results available to others in
an easy way.
So,
DMAC has dropped the requirement of tracking bugs; we just want a
good Q&A system.
Some of the features that are a must are as follows:
-
Keep
track of most popular questions at any time and make access to
them the quickest and easiest.
-
Allow
searches of all types; both questions and answers.
-
Let
DMAC know which questions arise most frequently so DMAC can
eliminate the cause of the questions.
This
is an ambitious project; so, if you have any good examples on the
web, please send us the link.
|
|
When
Holes Occur In Systems, The Tough Do What They Must
|
|
Anyone
who has ever worked with Tina Kay knows she can succinctly define
a problem and make the solution look easy. It never is. This is a
story bragging about a DMAC client that took Tina’s comments to
heart.
The
client is a new one this year. They were converting from a
competitive product. Somewhere in the conversion process Tina
found that the other system allows special treatment of blank
fields. Tina went orbital. She raved for about a week here at DMAC
that no wonder data capture has such a name for low accuracy. Then
she told the client she thought the treatment for blank fields
allowed a tremendous number of errors to go through the client’s
system. She even drew upon her masters of experimental statistics
education to “beat” on the client.
That
is the background. This is the story.
The client sorta became quiet for a while; Tina feared she
had insulted the client.
Then
lo and behold (holiday cheers!) Tina received a request for help
with a problem the client was having with the particular project.
“Wow,” she said. The client sent her one of the best-written,
most complete, best documented, superlative-in every-way-program.
Two-dimensional arrays were correctly used.
Multiple file output; multiple pass processing. The program
sets a new high in understanding of the Unibase by DMAC AID
language. Not since Ceridian’s John Hollohan and Dick McGrath
has DMAC seen such power and glory in AID programs!
Needless
to say, the client took to heart what Tina had to say about
plugging holes. DMAC expects we all will hear about the success
this client will enjoy this coming year. Our collective hat’s
off to the client.
|
|
Incentive
Systems Based on Net Keystrokes Work;
Using Gross Strokes Requires Extra Care and Concern
|
|
For
fifteen years DMAC has be pushing Unibase. Finally, one client has
found that if he pays keyers incentive pay based on Gross
Keystrokes rather than the recommended Net Keystrokes bad things
happen. The keyers in his shop have learned they can exaggerate
the gross keystrokes on very fast machines.
At
DMAC we have been patching “holes” in recording gross
keystrokes which appear on these super fast machines. We will keep
patching until no new exaggerations appear.
These
exaggerations are easy to spot by eye. But they can slip by if the
client is not careful. Any time a keyer’s total gross strokes
are more than a given percentage above net strokes, the client
started looking. Bingo.
The
latest Unibase by DMAC 8.0 has the patches included. Ain’t life
great?
|
|
Unibase on LINUX
Requires Experience; But Oh How Great When It Works Well
|
|
Unibase
by DMAC on LINUX has received poor reviews at times. DMAC’s
developers scratch their heads, cannot come up with an
explanation. But this past month, I had the privilege of watching
a LINUX installation in a UNIX shop firsthand.
I thought I might report to you all about this install and
why it went so smoothly. I did not touch a key on the users
keyboard. I watched and kibitzed.
First,
the LINUX box was going into a UNIX shop; the experience was
present to solve problems as they occurred.
Second,
the Gnome user interface would not work on LINUX because the GUI
interface had been disabled on the LINUX hardware box.
Third,
the user previously had observed every problem that occurred
during the install.This problem had occurred on either the
user’s UNIX or other LINUX systems.
Fourth,
the user understood about the differences between UNIX, LINUX and
Microsoft. For instance, wild cards characters on the command line
were considered a “No, No.”
Fifth,
permissions were set aside until after the install was complete.
Everything was installed as “root.”
Sixth,
Kermit was used on the Microsoft client computers. Three other
packages were available, but since DMAC knew that Kermit would
work, the user installed with Kermit and will experiment with the
other products later.
Seventh,
the issues of upper and lower case file names were understood.
Eighth,
the user put off bringing up Samba and WebBase by DMAC until the
system was stable and used for a while. (A long while, neither has
been attempted yet.)
Ninth,
the user had many hard copy LINUX manuals for reference during the
LINUX startup.
Is
DMAC recommending a LINUX based Unibase by DMAC system? No, not
right now. The skill sets are not available in the general
run-of-the-mill computer world at this time. Will DMAC sell LINUX
systems. Sure, if the user can convince DMAC that they can handle
LINUX.
The
rewards are many; the risks are many.
|
|
Purchase of Unibase by
DMAC Online; Soon To Be Available
|
|
A
year ago DMAC paid money to consultants to enable prospective
clients to purchase DMAC products over the web on a 24 by 7 basis.
The project failed. For the past year we have studied the reasons
for the failure. Slowly we have approached that wall of ignorance
and uncertainty again and again. Each time we find new reasons to
go slow.
Now
we think we are getting close. Let us review some of the issues
that we have had to resolve.
First,
we had to come up with a new method of authorization for product
and for adding number of users to a Unibase by DMAC, Unibase
Imaging and WebBase by DMAC license. We settled on an RSA based
public key, private key approach. Naturally, the older approach
had to still work also.
Second,
we had to find a secure site to process the payment. After much
thought and investigation, we settle on “PayPal.”
As part of our investigation, Fred opened a PayPal account.
Then to see how it worked, he had to buy “stuff” on Ebay.
Actually had to learn how to bid; but he did it. Tough job Fred
does.
Third,
DMAC had to redesign its web sites to actually do the processing.
Wow, that took work. We think we have the authorization codes
going out automatically when the payment clears PayPal. No human
intervention. If we had allowed a human to send the authorization
code, we could have had this process up and running in May.
Forth,
we had to build new databases to track the sales. Naturally, DMAC
plans on using DMAC products for the databases. These databases
will be automatically populated as part of the payment process.
Finally,
we have to test and test and test the process. That is where we
are now.
So soon, you will have more convenience in the acquisition
cycle.
|
|
Washington’s Space
Needle Attracts Fred; DMAC Welcomes New Seattle Client
|
|
Every
since it was build in 1963, Fred has wished to eat (Fred loves to
eat!) in the Space Needle’s restaurant in Seattle, Washington.
Finally, a prospective client’s presentation and demo brought
Fred to the Needle restaurant. Food and view were great!
Now
you all who think Fred is slightly daft, remember that Fred’s a
mechanical engineer and the Space Needle is a wonderful
engineering feat. First in 1963 it shocked the world with its one
horsepower revolution system (puny?). Then the complete
refurbishment in the 1990's was also a great feat.
DMAC
also achieved some wonders while Fred was there also. A sixteen
user system was up and running in just seven minutes. Tina
accomplished this. The install speed was not bad at all. Also,
against a great competitive field, Unibase by DMAC was chosen as
the product to be installed early next year.
|
|
Tightwads
Can Learn New Tricks; XP Professional Has Its Place
|
|
Microsoft
Windows XP Professional has reversed Fred’s tightwad instincts.
XP Professional is worth the extra cost when compared to XP Home
on a network with a domain server.
Sorting
through the hype on the Windows operating systems, especially with
Windows XP has been difficult. For at least the past year DMAC has
purchased E-machines with XP Home as the operating system. Every
time a new one was installed on DMAC’s network, DMAC’s users
complained how slow the system was. So much finger pointing made
Fred think of a puppet show. Sorting through the proposed
solutions was tough.
After
trying every tweak DMAC people could find, XP Home did not run
faster for long. Finally, DMAC’s people noticed that Microsoft
said that XP Home uses NetBios for networking while XP
Professional uses true TCP/IP protocol.
DMAC
found that XP Professional could be used to upgrade XP home.
Finally Fred broke down and bought a copy of XP Professional. No
speed improvement happened when XP Professional was first
installed. But quick investigation showed that the new XP
Professional computer was still a member of the workgroup. When
moved to the domain, by golly, the speed jumped forward, just like
Microsoft said it would.
Of
course, the full-speed-ahead approach had its “gotchas.”
Had to get on the E-machine web site and obtain the display
driver. XP Professional had lost the display driver and reverted
to 640x480 default generic driver mode.
And
all the desktop icons disappeared.
Don’t know where they went. Was able to create new
shortcuts; so just a small pain.
And
don’t forget, you can only install one copy on one computer with
XP Professional. DMAC must buy a copy for each E-machine. Oh well,
DMAC will get used to immediately upgrading a computer when it is
purchased. Just add the software to the cost of the new machine.
Of course if low cost vendors were to sell machines with XP
Professional installed instead of XP Home, we would all win.
Definitely
worth the money, inconvenience and effort. The speed makes one
proud to have a computer again. This XP Professional over XP Home
becomes a minimum requirement for network based XP Windows
operating systems.
|
|